<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Private Internet Access on OptOut.ws</title><link>https://www.optout.ws/tags/private-internet-access/</link><description>Recent content in Private Internet Access on OptOut.ws</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>OptOut.ws</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.optout.ws/tags/private-internet-access/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>NordVPN vs Surfshark vs PIA: Which VPN Protects Privacy?</title><link>https://www.optout.ws/post/nordvpn-vs-surfshark-vs-pia/</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.optout.ws/post/nordvpn-vs-surfshark-vs-pia/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;The three claims every VPN makes — no logs, no tracking, no data surrendered to governments — are easy to print on a marketing page and impossible to verify without independent evidence. &lt;a href="https://www.anrdoezrs.net/click-101817798-12814518?sid=nordvpn-vs-surfshark-vs-pia" target="_blank" rel="sponsored noopener"&gt;NordVPN&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://www.anrdoezrs.net/click-101817798-6282055?sid=nordvpn-vs-surfshark-vs-pia" target="_blank" rel="sponsored noopener"&gt;Surfshark&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="https://www.privateinternetaccess.com"&gt;Private Internet Access&lt;/a&gt; all make those claims. The meaningful difference between them is what substantiates the claim: a third-party audit from a recognized firm, an actual court subpoena that produced nothing, or an open-source codebase that lets anyone inspect what the app sends.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>